Meningioma Tumors & Dental X-Ray Frequency | Natural Health Blog

Date: 04/14/2012    Written by: Hiyaguha Cohen

Dental X-Rays Trigger Brain Tumors

If the dentist asks you to open wide and say "Aahhh," you just might want to say "No" instead, especially if the next step involves getting X-rays. A new study has found that there's a strong link between dental x-ray frequency and a type of brain tumor called meningioma.1 The finding makes the annual obligatory set of dental x-rays seem excessive indeed.

Meningioma tumors are benign, but they can trigger not-so-benign conditions including vision and hearing loss, memory loss, headaches, and seizures. A lot of the mischief they cause comes from the fact that they can grow to be the size of baseballs, exerting inordinate pressure inside the skull. The incidence of meningioma tumors is 7.8 per 100,000 annually.2 Ionizing radiation triggers the growth of these tumors, and dental X-rays are the most prevalent artificial source of such radiation. We also get exposed daily to naturally occurring ionizing radiation in the atmosphere and in high altitude airplane flights -- that's where over 80 percent of our exposure comes from -- but that ubiquitous exposure isn't directed in a focused beam right at our heads.

The study, just reported in the journal Cancer, involved 1,400 meningioma patients between the ages of 20 and 79 and 1350 control subjects who were clear of the condition.The researchers found that the risk of developing a meningioma tumor was double for those who had a bitewing X-ray "anytime" in their life. In case you've forgotten (or if you've never had bitewings), they're the type of X-ray where the dentist shoves a piece of hard cardboard into one side of your mouth and asks you to bite down while shooting film of your jaw. In the study, those who had bitewings every year as part of their dental exams had up to a 90 percent greater risk of developing the tumors.3

Even worse than the bitewings for triggering tumors were a type of X-ray called panorex, which films your entire head to get pictures of all your bottom and top teeth. Panorex X-rays involve sitting in a chair while the camera circles round your head, shooting plenty of film.

Dentists love the panorex. It gives them so much information at once, plus, they can charge you plenty for it. The website 1-800-DENTIST calls the panorex, "The Ultimate Experience" (no joke). It says, "Much like a panoramic picture, the panorex X-ray provides a full view of the scenery -- in this case, your entire oral cavity!" Sounds like a plug for a trip to the Bahamas, doesn't it?

But the panorex is no trip to an exotic location. While the X-rays might indeed help dentists to efficiently identify deeper issues with your jaw and teeth, the cost for that clarity (in addition to higher expense) is a way higher risk of developing a meningioma tumor. The study found that subjects who had a panorex exam before the age of 10 had almost five times the risk of developing meningioma later in life, compared to those who had the same exam when older. Those who had the most frequent panorex evaluations had triple the risk of tumor development compared to those who never had a panorex.

 

The dental profession doesn't want this news to scare people into avoiding dental exams, or X-rays. A statement issued by the American Dental Society says, "Many oral diseases can't be detected on the basis of a visual and physical examination alone, and dental X-rays are valuable in providing information about a patient's oral health such as early-stage cavities, gum diseases, infections, or some types of tumors."

The study's author, Dr. Elizabeth Clausen of Yale University, concurs. She advises that we should reduce our dental X-ray frequency. "These findings should not prevent anyone from going to the dentist," she says. "But it appears that a large percentage of patients receive annual X-rays instead of every two to three years, which is the recommendation for healthy adults."

The medical community also points out that the strength of dental X-rays has diminished considerably over the last few decades. "Our study," Dr. Claus says somewhat dismissively, "refers to exposures in the past rather than exposures that people are receiving in this day and age."4

And in truth, many of the meningioma patients in the study had bitewing X-rays in the 1960's, when the dose of radiation dental patients received was much higher than now. But before being comforted by that assertion, remember that back then, dentists also assured patients that the X-rays they received were of such low intensity that they "couldn't possibly" do any harm. The fact is that even the reduced levels of radiation in current dental X-rays may not be completely safe, especially given the cumulative effects over a lifetime.

Currently, the American Dental Association recommends that children get x-rays every year or two; adults, every two or three. As Dr. Clausen points out, one big problem is that a fair number of dentists recommend more frequent films, up to twice a year for growing children, rationalizing that kids get frequent cavities and their teeth change so fast. But even if dentists do follow the most conservative ADA recommendations, when you weigh risks against benefits, the upshot may well tilt in favor of reducing the frequency of screenings by X-ray a lot further.

If you already have dentaphobia, this news could certainly put you over the edge into utter avoidance of dentistry, but as Jon Barron has written before, dental and periodontal disease can trigger more serious conditions and need to be dealt with. They key to protecting yourself really is to find the right dentist in the first place -- one sympathetic to alternative approaches, and one who will be honest and listen to your concerns. X-rays aren't the only danger lurking in the traditional dentist's office (but that's the subject for another blog), so it's really critical to make sure your dentist is on board with natural medicine. Better yet, follow the Baseline of Health recommendations for preventing periodontal decay in the first place.

1 Huget, Jennifer La Rue. "Study links dental x-rays to brain tumor risk." 10 April 2012. Washington Post. 10 April 2012. <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-checkup/post/study-links-dental-x-rays-to-brain-tumor-risk/2012/04/09/gIQALz8k6S_blog.html>

2 Stevens, Glen H.J. "Brain Tumors: Meningiomas and Gliomas." Cleveland Clinic. 10 April 2012. < http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/medicalpubs/diseasemanagement/hematology-oncology/brain-tumors/>

3 Boyles, Saylene. "Dental X-Rays Linked to Brain Tumors." 10 April 10, 2012. WebMD. 10 April 2012. <http://www.webmd.com/brain/news/20120410/dental-x-rays-linked-brain-tumors>

4 Bazell, Robert. "Dental x-rays can double brain tumor risk, study finds." Vitals. 10 April 2012. < http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/10/11106520-dental-x-rays-can-double-brain-tumor-risk-study-finds?lite>

Click for Related Articles

Comments

  •  
    Submitted by Lester Sawicki on
    April 15, 2012 - 7:57am

    According to the American Association of Neurological Surgeons women are three times more likely to be diagnosed with a benign menangioma but they don't say why. This may sound improbable and less dangerous than dental x-rays but televisions emit ionizing radiation and more women were home watching soap operas during the 1960's. The tumor can also occur in the spine and both high and low dose ionizing radiation are probable causes. My question is why weren't chest x-rays included in the study? I can remember years ago when my physician was recommending one more often than I thought necessary.

  •  
    Submitted by Barry on
    April 16, 2012 - 6:24pm

    Hi. I just read the ACTUAL scientific article that you are using to make all of these sweeping conclusions about dental x rays. I notice that you didn't use it as a reference in your "article." People are counting on outlets like yours to receive an honest view of health topics. The use of other peoples' articles from MSNBC and the Washington Post seems like you have no interest in doing your due diligence on these important topics.
    The wording you use is emotionally loaded and leads your reader to believe that some dentist has wronged you at some point. I am truly sorry that you feel that way. Let me assure you that dentists do not do panoramic films or bitewings so that they can get money. Would you tell your primary care physician that they are just trying to get money from you by getting routine blood work done? Maybe you would. The truth is, those are tools of a profession that are designed to catch health issues early so that the patient does not develop more serious diseases.
    In terms on meningioma risk, what we need to discuss is all of the sources of radiation that can be contributing. Flying, going through security at the airport, going out in the sun, using a cell phone, and using a microwave will all irradiate people. I think we can draw correlations between any of these and any cancer.
    I hope that an alternative for diagnosis of cavities between teeth and jaw pathology/cancer will be invented. Until then, this is the best tool that dentists have to diagnose these issues and I will openly have them done to me to ensure my mouth is healthy.

  •  
    Submitted by BaselineFoundation on
    April 17, 2012 - 12:30pm

    Dear Barry:

    It almost sounds as if you’re responding to someone else’s blog. Our blog didn’t say “don’t” get dental X-rays. It said to get fewer of them, which was the recommendation of the study’s authors, not to mention the American Dental Association. As Dr. Clausen, the study’s author said, "These findings should not prevent anyone from going to the dentist," she says. "But it appears that a large percentage of patients receive annual X-rays instead of every two to three years, which is the recommendation for healthy adults." As for your other point, that we are exposed to many other sources of radiation, the blog actually covers that and explains why dental X-rays are a particular problem when it comes to menigioma . “We also get exposed daily to naturally occurring ionizing radiation in the atmosphere and in high altitude airplane flights -- that's where over 80 percent of our exposure comes from -- but that ubiquitous exposure isn't directed in a focused beam right at our heads.” It’s the focusing on the head, that makes it particularly damaging. Incidentally, cell phones and microwave ovens emit “non-inonizing” radiation – not “ionizing” radiation, as do dental X-rays. Very different animal!

    Hope that helps.

  •  
    Submitted by Gary Myers on
    May 11, 2012 - 1:09pm

    I have to agree with Barry, your blog used some unnecessary emotional language against the dentist and dental experience. But you did echo the disclaimer that people shouldn't avoid going to the dentist and should just get less x-rays. I would appreciate it if you would have Jon Barron look over the actual article and dissect it like he does an article critical of alternative medicine. I believe he would find some shaky study methods they use to make their claim. Primarily they rely on patients recall of more than 40 years ago on films taken and frequencies. As a result, the relationship of cancer to dental x-rays comes out much higher for bitewing xray than it does for full mouth xrays (bitewings are 4 films while full mouth xrays are about 20 films). So lower radiation exposure leads to higher cancer than higher xray exposure. This is likely due to poor recall of the study subjects which should make the entire study irrelevant...unless you are the washington post looking for a story.

    Disclaimer. I am a pediatric Dentist who uses as low and infrequent as necessary xrays. I frequently share these blogs and Jon's reports with my patients. I don't really like the panoramic xray as most of the time it is doesn't show up anything very useful, but when it does, like on a 17 year old girl last month, it is dramatic. We caught an Ameloblastoma early and she didn't have to have her jaw removed thanks to our "routine" panoramic xray!

  •  
    Submitted by Caette on
    May 12, 2012 - 8:25pm

    I agree with limiting radiographs of all types. However, I don't know how any study can really prove a cause and effect here. It would be impossible to have a truly scientific study as there are too many variables.

  •  
    Submitted by Matthew on
    December 19, 2013 - 12:03am

    My wife went in to have a wisdom tooth removed. They said the xray sent from dentist didn't show that whole tooth. So they had to do another xray. Of that tooth. But actually they took my wife in and gave her a full around the head panorex xray. I told them very carefully that we wanted to limit xray exposure. They agreed. Then they gave her a full blast anyway. So basically they did not care what we thought. Had they done this to the party chief's wife in some countries they would have found a dank prison cell. It is about power, money and entitlement. In Oregon they have lobbied to make xrays mandatory. And you dare to tell me it isn't in greedy self interest?

    The problem with all the critics of this article is that they see themselves as entitled gods. Doctor dentist knows best. Patient knows nothing, ca-$-ching ca-$-ching.

    These people won't back down and apologize for the greedy techno driven excesses of their professions until there is a purge.

Add New Comment